Nicholas Carr argues in his most recent article in the Atlantic that the Internet is beginning to have a profound impact on reading skills which has an accompanying negative consequence for deep thinking and cognition.
The explosion of online information has lead to an almost obsessive compulsion among many users to try to keep on top of all new information within a given subject area. Since so much information is being produced it leads to a very shallow type of "skimming" necessary to cover the breadth of data produced on a daily basis.
Carr's article notes a University College London five-year study of user online behavior which concludes:
"It is clear that users are not reading online in the traditional sense; indeed there are signs that new forms of “reading” are emerging as users “power browse” horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for quick wins. It almost seems that they go online to avoid reading in the traditional sense."
The problem with power browsing is that it does not promote deep or critical thinking about the subject matter. While there is not yet strong empirical evidence to support the claim that we are 're-wiring" our brains this is a critical time for reflection on how the tools we may be relying on may be altering our perception.
Nicholas Carr argues in his most recent article in the Atlantic that the Internet is beginning to have a profound impact on reading skills which has an accompanying negative consequence for deep thinking and cognition.
[1] Nicholas Carr, "Is Google Making Us Stupid", The Atlantic, July/August 2008, http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google
Comments
Impact of Reading Online
Interesting article in the NYTimes today about the debate about the impact of the Internet on reading behavior and cognition, see http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/books/27reading.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper&oref=slogin
Jerry Sheehan
Manager for Government Program Development @ Calit2/UCSD
phone: 858.336.2622
yahoo: calit2s
skype: zenchaos
twitter: www.twitter.com/zenchaos
Internet and language cognition
Good article. I did not find any comment about if the Internet changed how Chinese readers process their ideograms while perusing articles written in Chinese. Are Nicholas Carr's comments only about English speakers/users? I suppose French and German and others are processed similar to English but what about Japanese? Do these users have the same online behavior?
>>Sometimes you get it right by mistake<<
Good Question...
Dennis:
I haven't seen anything written about impact across cultural divides. Do you have any pointers?
Jerry Sheehan
Manager for Government Program Development @ Calit2/UCSD
phone: 858.336.2622
yahoo: calit2s
skype: zenchaos
twitter: www.twitter.com/zenchaos
Internet and cultural divides
Jerry,
No. It would seem to be a good study, though. I'm pretty sure the Chinese and Japanese use the Internet at least as much as we do. Aren't there some Asian members that could contribute to this conversation?
>>Sometimes you get it right by mistake<<
Web's impact on Chinese literacy
Cognitive science is still a relatively underdeveloped field in China. So I doubt something like this has been given much attention. I will look into this matter further.
Although not thoroughly studied, one impact of electronic media on literacy that most educated people have noticed is a decline in the ability to write characters. My guess is that any well educated university graduate should be able to read and write about 5,000 to 8,000 characters. This is a real problem compared to just having to remember how to write 26 letters of an alphabet. The heavy use of word processing, whereby users simply have to recognize a character rather than be able to write it, has definitely resulted in an erosion in the average number of characters even educated people can remember how to write. Without the repetitive reinforcement of motor memory in actually writing the strokes for characters instead of keying them, people simply forget how to write. There must also be a lesser but definite impact on recognition.